Jerry, I think you understood the meaning of what I wrote. I do appreciate your input and the article. I'm not trying to defend anyone here, but if you look at the date the article was written you will see that it was well over 10yrs ago. I would certainly hope that no one would compare me to the person that I was 10yrs ago. Lord knows I've said and done some really stupid things. I always say that I reserve the right to change my opinion at any moment. The foundation which I lay my feet on today my be different tomorrow because of new information that I may recieve or because I am just evolving as a person. I am not saying anything about Erles beliefs or attitudes. I am simply saying that his forms seem legit and have substance and you can see that his internal roots are very strong. As for the character of a person, I read a saying recently that said,"You must be the change that you want to see in the world." I believe that this is very true.I do not advocate slandering anyone, but I realize that I've not always held myself to these same standards in the past. I also realize that in each face I see; I see my own reflection. So, in saying these things, all I ever intended to address was Erles forms, not his attitude or beliefs. I have never had a bad experience with him, so I will make my judgements based on today, not ten years ago. If Erle should put out anything that offends you in the near future, I would appreciate you sharing it. This way I can make current informed decisions.I appreciate you taking the time to respond. I also look forward to future discussions. Have a great day.